But he that hateth his brother, is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, and knoweth not whither he goeth; because the darkness hath blinded his eyes. I write unto you, little children, because your sins are forgiven you for his name's sake. I write unto you, fathers, because you have known him, who is from the beginning. I write unto you, young men, because you have overcome the wicked one. I write unto you, babes, because you have known the Father. I write unto you, young men, because you are strong, and the word of God abideth in you, and you have overcome the wicked one. Love not the world, nor the things which are in the world. If any man love the world, the charity of the Father is not in him.
1 John 2:11-15
The Dissident Right (DR) has a plethora of groups it directs its hatred towards. Whether it be racially-based, politically-based, sex-based, lifestyle-based, etc — there’s no end to the extent of their scorn. It is par for the course as an internet political movement. The internet is where you set aside your mercy and love for others. It is where many a downcast intellectual go to release their vitriol in a codependent relationship with others. Just as an alcoholic waddles back to the bar after work to spend time with other damaged drunks; the dejected political theorist plugs back into Twitter, Telegram, or YouTube to break bread with other aggrieved melancholics day in and day out. There is camaraderie in misery.
I have spoken of how they are a gestalt.
How their intellectual kingpins are toxic.
How they overemphasize race.
How their obsession with elite theory is deranged and unhelpful.
How their conception of power is broken.
It seems what ties everything together, regardless of the disagreements, is a preeminent belief in race realism, which is ultimately rooted in a Darwinian view of the world (which we’ll get to). This is what ties the entire movement together. You can be “Catholic,” protestant, pagan, or atheist; national socialist or libertarian; socially liberal or socially paleocon; antisemite or judeaizer. The only real prerequisite is that you hate blacks.
Maybe they wouldn’t use the word “hate.” Maybe they would prefer, “notice the truth about” as an alternative. They don’t hate blacks, they just notice how violent they are, how predisposed to crime they are, how addicted to drugs they are, how animalistic they are, how they ruin society. Nah yeah, they don’t hate blacks, but all they have to say about blacks reveals a deep-seated resentment that is more impassioned than their own spiritual beliefs (if they have any). Is it any surprise that the leading figures of the DR are an overweight atheist Iranian rug merchant, a Jewish Romanian sodomite, and a Jewish atheist Silicon Valley computer programmer? Not doggin’, just noticing, guys! Perhaps we could go back to the days of Dickie Spence (idolizes Israel) and Mike Enoch (whose wife is Jewish).
Now, I am not here to break down race realism as completely incorrect. It would be foolish to pretend that some people aren’t predisposed towards certain traits. What I am here to do is point out where this prominent belief in race realism is teleologically destined towards anti-Christian ends, how it has become (and perhaps always was) the locus of the DR and along the way, expose a certain homicidal and maniacal attitude that exists on the DR that is becoming an urgent concern.
Race Realism and the DR’s Commonality with the Left
Everybody can see differences in appearances. It’s literally the most immediately noticeable trait about somebody. However, the immediacy of race is not a universal factor that will decide how society ought to be. Yes, we are different. Your point?
The only reason you would make this point is if you were an atheist who didn’t have the brain cells to understand the cosmological argument for God (What is cannot come from what is not). Also, you might make this point if you were an anti-Christian Nietzschean like BAP (who is a Jew and a sodomite) and could not come to the understanding that identity is not founded in the self, but in others, and that meaning in life is founded in the most creative principle — love — and not the most destructive principle — hate.
Because we have severed ourselves from the Church and became secular societies, the long road back to reason — logos — has been paved with bold inanity. Atheist leftist anti-Christians, for example, have a fundamentally reversed understanding of causation. They think that depression is caused by low dopamine and serotonin levels, when it is the other way around — you have low dopamine and serotonin levels because you are depressed. Because they view all pre-Newtonian history as a dark age, their concept of good and evil spawn from a Cartesian self-relation. As in, you experience reality in a different world than I do, therefore, all good, evil, order, and chaos are just subjective experiences, and the goal of society is to indulge as much materialistic delight as possible.
Sense perception tells us that things move, but the mind tells us that sense perception is an illusion. How can mind refute the senses if matter is the ultimate reality? If the mind is nothing but matter, then thought is an illusion, which means that we have no way of knowing that mind is nothing but matter. Then as now, materialism ends in self-contradiction.
Logos Rising (page 163) by E. Michael Jones
This is where it gets interesting. Just as the leftists (whatever you want to call these people) have a self-contradictory view of reality because they are staunch materialists, rightists (whatever) are staunch materialists in having a reactionary response to everything that happens without a spiritual milieu present. They see patterns, then immediately draw a conclusion that those patterns imply an inherent fact about the people who they are pinning blame (or praise) on.
This is incredibly fallible. Why is it inherent in certain races to be more violent? Or more intelligent? Better runners? Better sprinters? Better lifters? There’s genetic contribution here, but to make this the basis for which you assess people then you are contradicting reason. How? Because you can reason with someone of a different race. We differ physically, but not spiritually. Just as leftists put the locus on the exceptions of society constantly, the rightists rally against exception when it is what so clearly puts their hypotheses into question. This is fundamentally materialist because you are analyzing why the group is this way, but taking obvious evaluations of their actions and saying that those actions are innate — rather than seeking why they act that way. And they aren’t biologically predisposed to being that way, because they have a soul and their ability to reason contradicts the hypothesis that they are innately unreasonable. Assuming they are innately the way they are implies that you take a Darwinian conception of the origin of life. Evolution and Darwinism are contradictory to Christian conceptions of life, objectivity, Being, and reality.
There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Galatians 3:28
Everything is right there. There is recognition of the difference between Jew and Greek, but a dialectical innovation being had — truth revealed through Christ (logos — language/reason defeating race) — that race is not something that precludes unity and cooperation. It is noticeable, but not the source for which all order in society emanates.
The reason there is so much pride DR people take in their “race” (the white one mainly) is because they don’t have ethnos. There might be coping about that, but overall, the embarrassing attempt at unifying under being white or being not anti-white is simply ludicrous. You cannot organize a society based on “white values” (not a thing). What neopagan wignats awkwardly don’t notice is all of their values about society are either emanating from protestantism or liberalism. They simply can’t get away from the fact they aren’t doing anything more than LARP when they prophesy a great white ethnostate in the future that somehow coalesces the superiority of white civilization. Whether in the mudflats of Idaho or the entire continental United States, “white civilization” won’t be a thing just like “black civilization” won’t be a thing.
White isn’t a thing. It’s an early (17th century) American invention used to distinguish themselves as superior to blacks (especially the Irish and Scottish). There isn’t a country called Whiteland. The fact is, America’s European heritage is now so diluted with its mix of different parts of Europe it can no longer pretend it is an extension of a specific ethnos. This problem extends to the Europeans in the DR as well, as they are equally as culpable of the same fallibility (which is way more embarrassing), but I don’t really care about speaking for them lol.
The loss of ethnic identity and separation from the Church is what has spawned this eugenicist predominance throughout the tribes of the DR. It is similar to the coping attitudes of Marcus Garvey and Malcolm X.
The emphasis on race is a result of internalizing evolution and the Darwinian worldview. They use the same base model that dialectical materialist leftists do. They do not realize how psyopped they are that they put a model of reality that is thoroughly atheistic and anti-spiritual. It is like watching Shia and Sunni Muslims argue over which dude Muhammad elected to be his successor.
The Big Bang, our origin not being from God but monkeys, the seniority of atheist and Jewish scientists and mathematicians over Christian and Greek philosophers — these all are the starting point of their ultimate argument that white men, black men, red men, brown men, and yellow men are fundamentally different and are not meant to be together. This culminates in dehumanization (if ever so subtle) of nonwhites who do actually have souls.
This is unreasonable and sinful on their part. And at this point, the amount of obsessive “noticing” has slowly emerged a worrying development of hate that, if not stopped now, will become unnecessary violence in the future.
Exhibit A: John Doyle
Totally not an incitement to violence, right?
John Doyle, one of many clickbait right-wing guys who subtly blow dog whistles in his work (becoming more normal these days) wrote this soliloquy. This wouldn’t matter if John wasn’t as big of a figure as he was — 31.9K Twitter followers and 349K YouTube subscribers. Not big in frame, but definitely big in the attention he gets.
Now what is being revealed by this tweet? What useful information about wretched modernity am I garnering by learning about the tragic murder of Blake Mohs by what were likely drug-addled insane people with terrible childhoods? On the face of it, not much. It makes me momentarily sad to think of a guy with a beautiful smile and life ahead of him had his life cut short. If we dig into the core of the situation, however, we don’t just see what someone like Doyle or much of the right wants to see — low IQ blacks who hate whites and want them all murdered. If we dig deep, we do not see, as Doyle points out, “violence is guaranteed in life & society.”
What happened was Blake intervened when he saw a woman steal something from a Home Depot. He was trying to be an upstanding citizen, and unfortunately, due to either drugs or a lack of a good Christian upbringing (or both or more) Mohs was killed by someone who viewed his life less than what the would-be thief (and now murderer) would potentially gain — likely drugs from the looks of the perpetrators.
Doesn’t this obviously go deeper? Historically and metaphysically the evils perpetrated in this country by economically downtrodden blacks is a culmination of many factors, but to say it is inherent in them is fundamentally Darwinian — and lazy. It is a conception of humanity not as beings meant for one another, but beingless creatures defined by their biology with no telos other than self-interest.
In Doyle’s tweet it seems quite clear that he thinks we ought to use “violence” to keep “those who are incompatible with civilization” under control. Don’t hear the dog whistles? Convenient. Yeah, he’s just talking about a nebulous, undefined group of people who are just incompatible with civilized society, right?
It makes me think of this comment, among others — the right just can’t stop noticing. They’ve achieved a gnosis state. They know, while others do not, but they so desperately want everyone to (k)no(w)tice. Notice what in specific? That blacks are violent and incompatible with civilization. If only we controlled them by violence (or banishment to Liberia) would everything miraculously improve.
Very based of you, Doyle! You don’t care that you are enabling an echo chamber of dehumanization of people who have souls!
The worst part is his self-identification of being Christian. It acts as more of a convenient label than praxis.
Exhibit B: Devon Stack, AKA Blackpilled
A classic! One of the OG alt-right dudes. This was from back in the day when they literally just self-defined themselves as racist liberals.
Pulled from a review of Devon Stack’s book Day of the Rope we get a pretty clear-cut explanation of how truly blackpilled he is. For years, just as he has pointed out the subversion within media by anti-Christians or Jews (not entirely wrong), he writes his own piece of self-indulgent neo-nazi fanfiction. I guess it goes to prove that no matter what kind of misanthropic nerd has the means to write, regardless if Jew or gentile, he will still write degenerate fantasies he wish could be lived out.
Unlike Doyle, who is a peripheral, shallower right-winger seeking out normiecon clicks, Stack is on the other end of insanity. He got his claim to fame back in the alt-right days of 2016 and 2017 talking about Jewish conspiracies to uproot white identity, how Hollywood was normalizing racemixing, and projecting his own insecurities onto other people (I remember him being a short fat guy, which doesn’t help out too much with confidence). He associates with the likes of Alternative Hypothesis, JF Gariepy, and other such wignats whose prime objectives are preserving the white race, talking about the bell curve, not backing up their historical and statistical claims with sources, and essentially making a religion out of white identity — but not much else.
Not much can be said about this, unlike Doyle’s dog whistle except just how blatantly unhealthy this kind of mindset is. What it shows is deep within these terminally online wignats lies genocidal fantasies, resentment of women, and jealousy of other races (blacks and Jews a lot of the time). Most blatantly, though, the echo chamber of resentment towards blacks, in specific, is what is persistently prolific. Jews have more to answer for, but it is plain to see blacks are victims of this system. Are Jews victims of usury? Of running Hollywood? I understand the anger, but this is less of a racial issue and more of a resentment of Christ issue (on the Jews’ part).
There’s a righteous indignation; a claim on everything by the white man — at least that’s what the DR seems to think. In fact, that’s really only their ultimate point being made. White people are a superior race who know how to do civilization but aren’t too autistic and statist like Asians because we stand up to authority therefore mister white man must rise to prevent the rest of the world from falling in on itself. This is the string of continuity throughout the entire movement — if other than just hating blacks.
Exhibit C: TinTin Enjoyer
Wait, it gets better:
“Bro, guys, have you heard about The Bell Curve!?”
As you can imagine this short thread TinTin writes ends up being a beginner level attempt at bashing blacks for being perceptibly dumb and he uses glorious academia to back himself up. Blacks lack intelligence! They’re just high time preference. They were evolved to be dumb, unlike us whites! And also Jews! Who are smart!
Why, though? Ah, no reason. We just are. Evolution just happened, and an eye just evolved from no eye. Just like our complex nervous system evolved from primordial goop billions of years ago.
TinTin and ilk are desperately trying to be “based” and “redpilled.” That is the ultimate driver behind the right, at this point. I mean, who hasn’t heard of the Bell Curve? Young, impressionable white American teenagers and men who otherwise may have not become psychotic eugenicists who are now enraptured by the gospel of Steve Sailor? What’s the point behind all this based and redpilled noticing anyway? Oh, well, just as I mentioned before — to appeal to the mythology and teleology that underpins the entirety of the DR’s talking points — Darwinism, philosopic materialism/physicalism, and scientism.
You can’t be Christian while also appealing to racial relativism. But shown in the first screenshot is really the crux of this entire article. He invoked God to rationalize the deaths of others in the name of muh civilization. What civilization? No, I’m serious. Answer me. What do you mean by civilization? What year? Are you talking about now, but more competent? Easier said than done. I’m being serious! Competence is not just a slider that you can turn up and make society’s blood pressure less diabetic. It’s more like a recipe that requires a dozen rare ingredients. White boys (wignats) don’t really want to be rational, though. Their beliefs and accepted (Darwinian) mythology is conveniently helpful to their own superiority complex, and not much else.
Consequences of Iniquity
Behold the hand of the Lord is not shortened that it cannot save, neither is his ear heavy that it cannot hear. But your iniquities have divided between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you that he should not hear. For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity: your lips have spoken lies, and your tongue uttereth iniquity. There is none that calleth upon justice, neither is there any one that judgeth truly: but they trust in a mere nothing, and speak vanities: they have conceived labour, and brought forth iniquity.
Isaiah 59:1-4
The vanity of man can overcome his love of mercy and forgiveness, yet the Lord is merciful to all. It is a crime that man commits when he uses his God-given gift of rationality, yet corrupts it with his own fanciful self-serving explications. The DR has fallen down the route of no longer providing any hard-hitting insight, and all that unifies it is a racial animus. If we are to take this to its logical end, it becomes eugenicist — just as all the pagan guys are and alt-right racist liberals were. Keyword “were.”
Beyond what conversations are had as we repeat over and over the same garbage that benefits no one to hear, the one that stands above it all is an allegiance to a model of reality that is fundamentally destructive (hateful) and wrong. There’s no way any sensible Christian could contribute to this in a reasonable way. You end up falling to the level of those who put race above everything — something that only builds up their pride and denigrates their soul.
That’s the unfortunate thing, though. If you bring this up at all, you are going to be dogged on universally. You can denigrate any frame of reality whether economic, spiritual, whatever, but when we get onto the conversation of race, it is just an assumed matter that blacks are violent and we can’t associate with them. This is the unifying principle of the right. Beyond anything, this is what makes it a thing. I just wonder what would happen when the left adopts this frame in any feasible way; how would y’all react? In applause and celebration? Or do you care about something deeper about what rots society? Secularism atomized whites and economically disfavored blacks. Whether or not you think both “races” are compatible, the system never favored either and brought out the worst aspects of both, perceptibly. All the American experiment really did in the long run was annihilate ethnos and logos for all that dwell within. I feel sorry for the humiliatingly goofy Europeans who are just as deracinated as Americans. They don’t really have a reason to be. Especially if all they have to say is, “Brown people bad.” What happens when you kick out the browns? Will epic science rule all and bring about eternal peace? Is the problem so shallow that it’s just brown bad, white good?
Imagine if it was that easy. If you were a pagan or an atheist (one in the same), it’d perceptibly be that easy. But neither of those types really care about civilization. They just like complaining and being contrarian.
If you’re actually going to engage in a furtherance of Truth you have to be a little bit more original than just “white good, brown bad.” The hint you have is technological innovation and our primitive interface with it in an utterly transactional way. If you are going to overcome it, a modus operandi of logos is in order. If you put the constructiveness of Christ as unifier in front of all, and let all your other secular constructions pass away, the issue of race is just another problem to expropriate from the left and utilize for the sake of furthering order, love, and society. Society doesn’t form in spite of love. Even in war, love is what brings a nation to fight against it’s enemy.
I didn’t even try with this one. I opened twitter for a minute and a fella is doing exactly what I’ve been blabbering about. Perhaps a comedically appropriate way to end this. He was talking about a happy old man working at Home Depot because he had nothing better to do. Once again, yet another unknowingly modernist misconception seeping into the DR.
There is nothing more despicable than hate. It is what yearns to destroy. It is the easy route — just as a building or monument takes years to build, it takes seconds to knock down. Your brothers and sisters transcend their bodily vehicles, and are more than their “race” — their ethnos. If you are to denigrate those who could be your allies, you will fall to the same evils of the leftists who speak in the same language that you do — in race, in hatred, in biology and scientism. Your duty isn’t to race, for you race is that of the Body of Christ. There is nothing more than that, and what is less than that will be united to what is right, or fall away for being inconsequential.
“It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.”
G.K. Chesterton
Thanks to a follower of mine for inspiring this article and providing the exhibits used!
Thanks for writing this one up. I think you knocked it out of the park. It’s not a popular thing to write about because you’re not preaching to a “side” but rather than proclaiming the Word of God which doesn’t always fall on listening ears.
I grew wary with the DR when they wouldn’t stop going on about the horrors of race mixing and the freaks of nature that it produces. I’m have a mixed race rather, I’m in an interracial marriage with two mixed race daughters. I would have never come back to Faith had it not been for my wife who wanted me to be the spiritual head of our family. If that’s not “good fruit” then I don’t know what is. Compare that to many guys on the DR who aren’t married, don’t have kids and spend all their time online.
Devon Stack and John Doyle yearn for the racially homogenous days of the 1950s but if whites were so brilliant and intelligent, then how come it all came undone in a decade? It wasn’t blacks who created Planned Parenthood, designed the pill, and pushed women out of the home into the workforce. Stack would argue that it was all Jewish subversion, but again, if white gentiles are so amazing then we would’ve seen through the subterfuge and rejected the poison.
All in all, I think you’re in a good place spiritually and you talk about this subject with nuance. Well done.
I just think that the DR has backed itself into a corner such that it wants to take the side of whites in every situation for good reason (the attack on whites in mainstream media).
This leads to a peculiar problem when the question of what's causing the decline of the west comes up. People begin to look for someone to blame. It's easier to look elsewhere than into oneself. The decline began when the west was still majority white and Christian though, so the answers begin there.
I myself have many criticisms of my own people, but the truth is that their increasing violence is just another symptom of western decline, not the cause.
Personally, I just think the right is easily psyopped by certain narratives that get them distracted. My hope is that the DR will get a wakeup call and again begin to produce the high quality work that they were consistently producing just a couple years ago. I really feel as though the narratives that have become popular on the DR this year are being algorithmically pushed to purposely distract it from making more useful and insightful commentary (its only true strength).