3 Comments

lol, edgy article as far the DR is concerned.

I often find it strange that people who wear the aesthetic of loving the past have a strong tendency to rely on empiricism to justify themselves. It seems rather bizarre to me as I try to avoid empiricism at all costs these days. When explaining things, I try to use metaphor and biblical logos over anything else. I think the race issue is a pillar of the DR because it's an obvious critique of western regimes, and the solutions (basically-->deport, forcibly exile or sterilize, race war, etc.) remain ethereal and fantastical, generally difficult to do even if you were able to get the power to do them.

Basically, saying extreme racial stuff can get you attention, and you never have to get your ideas to work. It's good at generating an audience, and everyone tacitly agrees since vast majority on the DR are not part of those races. "It's an easy way to make friends on the e-right," one might say.

This is in juxtaposition with the "woman" issue that guys on the e-right have around 3 extremely divisive (but doable and closer-to-home) "solutions" to (i.e. "enjoy the decline," "try and find good woman," and "MGTOW"). Even though lacking strong communities and the women issue affects white people the most imo (if you have a strong community (strong common identity) that reproduces, then you can defend your own from any foreign groups), solutions to that issue are more difficult to reconcile across the DR because they are pertinent to men right now, not in some fantastical future where they have the power. It's harder to generate solidarity around any one particular solution to the woman issue in comparison to the fantasy solutions to the race issue--obviously I'm assuming the current elites won't stop importing people or championing race-based oppression narratives--because the woman solutions can actually be tested and tried currently.

No one can make millennial women being middle-aged and never having married or had kids less depressing. No one can make the transing of young women (primarily white women with le autism) less depressing. No one can make the overwhelming absorption of rainbow coalition values by women in general less depressing. It's all really depressing, and it's happening en masse to women.

I personally think that the woman issue is arguably more devastating to the survival of white people than the race issue (also all other people groups trapped in modernity in the long-term). My reference for it being "more devastating" is that a *certain group of people*, though being a small-in-number group, have survived for millennia, surrounded by other groups that hated them, by having a strong in-group preference and identity (and high IQ). In other words, your group can survive an invasion (being overwhelmed with numbers by another group) as long as you maintain your ethnic identity and culture plus tight-knit social groups based around that culture that support one another.

Thoughts?

Expand full comment